Q. which is blamed for IRUDA’s inappropriate word usages and expressions? Its developers? Users? IRUDA itself?
It is indeed a tricky yet interesting question. I don’t necessarily think things without empathy could be the ones I consider trustworthy. IRUDA may have been intelligent and said like a human. However, it was just collecting information and pinpointing the right moment where they can use the collected information regardless of its appropriateness. For anyone who’s learned computer science would know the definition of information. Information is something that is retrievable, and processable. So among those considered as information are images, strings, video and integer, float, you name it but not emotions. They can’t tell the subtle nuances, and beauty of considerations for others. Therefore, in whatever ways, developers should have known how to prevent those indecent words spoken by IRUDA.
